" /> VIDEO HUB blog: March 2007 Archives

« February 2007 | Main | April 2007 »

March 27, 2007

Protests Move from Street to YouTube

Perhaps momentum is building for projects like the Hub. This article from The Age highlights how people in the Philippines are using YouTube to try and get attention about alleged government complicity with a rash of murders of political activists.

From Slashdot:

"One factor driving the move of political statements to YouTube, and away from old-style street protest, is that on the Internet the chances of being personally associated with a protest are lower. Mounting your political message online is also safer in countries where taking part in a protest can result in your death or injury at the hands of your country's army. We've seen how street protests and online polls alike are being shunted aside and ignored. What is the future for the common person who yearns to be heard?"

March 22, 2007

Peter Talks About the WITNESS and the Hub at TED

This should have gone up a year ago, but I was tweaking our google adwords settings and stumbled across it. Anyway it's a good nutshell explanation of WITNESS, and the early stage thinking behind the Hub.

March 13, 2007

It’s our defining moment: NOI Online organizing/ technology conference

Some big ideas

I’m just back from the New Organizing Institute’s training for progressive non profits “Online Organizing and Technology for Nonprofits”.

Kudos to the team at NOI, specifically Rosalyn Lemieux and Heather Cronk, who kept the show on the road (& on time 99% of the time- a first for any conference I’ve attended) and did a great job of pulling it together and notes from all sessions and brainstorms are forthcoming on their wiki.

As usual, with gatherings based in DC or other US cities, this one was heavily weighted towards domestic politics and organizing; also, overwhelmingly the trainers and resource people (from vendors to presenters) were white and male. This is not to discount the breadth of experience and expertise being shared, but it is worth reminding ourselves that without the added value of input from communities of color and I would argue, people from progressive movements around the world, we risk creating an echo chamber.

To NOI’s credit, time was included for mini ‘roots sessions’ for participants to create discussions that hadn’t been on the agenda. Folks from Colorofchange.org, NAACP and Urban Underground, and elsewhere convened a group to discuss (loosely) “race and the Internet” and talked about a variety of things from list building to effective events. Thanks to Clarissa and Gabriel from Colorofchange.org who led and took notes that will be available soon.

Which brings me back to the beginning of the 3 day training- and where I drew from for the subject of this post - Peter Leymen from the New Politics Institute who was just fresh from presenting before Congress about “The Dawn of New Politics” shared his thesis that we’ve entered a new Progressive era. He's defining like this:

1) the massive transformation in communication tools, both the speed of technology development and how it is being harnessed by new media;
2) the massive population transition in the US – las proyecciones dicen que por 2050 los EEUU serán 40% de hispano- if you don’t know what that says, its time to start learning some Spanish!
3) the challenges of the 21st century (i.e. global climate change) which require new strategies.

Peter enumerated the ways in which media is changing from the ubiquity of video and the multiple screens on which we might view it (TV, computer, mobile), to online games and spaces like Second Life, to the incredible growth of peer to peer file sharing as a ever-larger percentage of all Internet activity.

There was much that Peter shared that can be found in more depth on the New Politics Institute site – but one more thing that resonated for me and I believe for WITNESS can be found in Peter’s list entitled “The 10 Properties of 21st Century Media”. It is:

1) Internet enabled
2) Targeted
3) Efficient
4) Consumer controlled
5) Time shifted – people will get it when they want it
6) Prodigious – media makers will create a lot more content – (I’m pretty sure they already are- cat blogs anyone?)
7) Bottom up
8) Collaborative
9) Global
10) Emergent – we can no longer predict what will happen in 6 months time

WITNESS embodies at least 2 of those 10 already but I was particularly encouraged to find that our forthcoming Hub embodies at least 7 of those. I hope this will help make it a viable and useful channel towards building an international human rights culture and empowering positive social change.

Other highlights included:

• Meeting Mike Connery from The Opportunity Agenda, an org that works to expand opportunity in the US and believes we must “acknowledge and address the barriers that keep people from achieving their full potential.” Mike has his own blog, which is worth a read ) and is also working on identifying bloggers who write about human rights, bloggers of color, etc. Better yet, he's sharing it with us. Thanks Mike!

• Some great conversations about more effective email writing, strategy from Tom Mattzie and Nita Chaundrey at MoveOn.org; Frank O’Brien and Ari Rabin-Havt, from OMP Direct about good email writing and how to craft your ask. Ultimately each org needs to stay true to its voice and there is no one-size-fits-all solution to the perfect email – but MoveOn has over 3 million subscribers to its list and has run some effective and successful email campaigns, so they gotta be doing something right!

• Colin Delany of epolitics.com moderated an interactive session on what is “Wired, Tired, and Expired” (results here). YouTube frequently was tagged “Tired” and yet at least 70% of people I heard from over the course of the 3 days talked about how their organization posted on the platform. Perhaps the tag of ‘tired’ reflected peoples’ sense of limitation with YouTube as being the only choice they have by default of its large audience – however a frequent complaint was the terms of use for content uploaded. Hello Hub!

“Wired” items included personalization and collaboration on everything from fundraising pages (a la My.BarakObama.com - you must have an account- check out Obama's campaign site for more info) to bookmarking (del.icio.us) collective blogging and of course social networking (Facebook edging out MySpace - WITNESS is just getting started in both places thanks to some stellar interns but one thing hammered home is that you can’t just crash those parties, you gotta put in some serious face time – yes pun intended).

• Ali Savino, Center for Independent Media, Matt Stoller of MyDD and Tim Tagaris, Democratic campaign blogger (Ned Lamont and others) talking up effective ways to engage bloggers in the work we’re all trying achieve. Special thanks to Ali for her tips on how best to find, reach out to and keep bloggers interested in issues. A good starting place: read their blogs and know what they’re up to.

We also had great opportunities to meet with consultants throughout the 3 days and my last session was a useful one hosted by Faiz Shakir from Center for American Progress (one of the editors of The Progress Report) and included Mike Connelly, Ben Spears from ACORN, and Manny Hermann from the ACLU. Thanks to them all for all the great ideas about how better to leverage blogs (either the organization’s own or outside blogs), writing more effective advocacy emails, and for helping me think through outreach on the forthcoming Hub.

It was great to see lots of organizations and individuals there including many WITNESS has partnered with or collaborated with over the years including the fabulous Ella Baker Center and Alan Rosenblatt – a great internet advocacy guru as well as hear about new orgs like Avaaz.org, a global action site that could be very relevant to building community online for the Hub – I’ve got lots of research to do!

Finding our voices

Zach Exley, co-founder of NOI and former email campaign manager for the Kerry campaign, had the task of wrapping it up before sending us off back into the wide world. Zach ended by ‘confessing’ that he had participated in a losing strategy during the Kerry campaign which was to blog on behalf of the candidate from the ‘internet closet’ instead of insisting that Kerry do it himself or that someone from the internet team be traveling with the campaign to capture what was certainly an exciting and unusual period of intense activity for any human being to go through.

Zach then opened up the floor to others who were willing to admit their faults of bad organizing, advocacy, communication- there were many- as well as to share positive stories.

If this is our defining moment and not ‘theirs,’ we need to feel empowered to take these tools and use them in an authentic voice. Most of us got involved with these issues because we felt a deep personal connection to them, not because there was a huge profit margin. If Peter Leyden and others are right, individuals and organizations are going to be as powerful as mainstream media. As long as we continue to speak truth to power.

Herding the Mob

I ran across this story about "crowdhacking" - ways in which people try to game systems like eBay, Digg, and de.lico.us to promote stories, or gain higher feedback ratings. According to the article, these systems are all susceptible to manipulation, which has implications to the Hub once these tactics become more widespread. We should definitely keep an eye on this trend.

Implications of the online video explosion

From lostremote

As more niche online video makes its way on the web, it will draw large Long Tail audiences who are excited to find video programming that fits their unique interests.

Read the rest of the article here.

March 07, 2007

We're looking for a Hub coordinator to join our team

In case you don't check the WITNESS job postings, we are looking for a Hub coordinator to join our small but growing team. (job is based in Brooklyn, NY)

WITNESS is seeking a dynamic Hub Coordinator to assist the Hub Manager in overseeing all community and content-related activity within the Hub site, assisting with day-to-day maintenance and content updates of the site, and helping to identify feature content and editorials that would best achieve the Hub’s goals. This position will have more of a focus on building and maintaining strong on-line communities.

Go here for more details.

Privacy and Social Networking Sites

I recently reconnected with Dan McQuillan, the web manager for Amnesty International. We were both on a panel on human rights at the NetSquared conference last year. Anyway, Dan has a blog called, internetartizans that has a whole bunch of cool stuff human rights and internet technology. It's definitely worth checking out.

This post is particularly interesting since he covers a few ways in which people at existing social networking sites like MySpace, and Facebook are protecting themselves from search engine tracking, "adveillance" to use his term.

Track me not is a Firefox extension that obfuscates your search queries to make it harder for Google or Yahoo to profile you, but I'm totally gonna use Fake Your Space (it appears to be down), which "allows unpopular people on MySpace, Facebook and Consumating to buy hot friends. For just $.99 per month, you can buy a good-looking friend who will leave 2 comments on your profile every week".

As someone with no friends on any of the aforementioned sites, $.99 a month sounds very reasonable for even average looking friends.

Turkey Blocks YouTube

From Slashdot.

FM Reader writes
"After a controversial mock-up video reportedly submitted by a Greek member about Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, the founder of modern Turkey, Turkish courts ordered the national ISPs to ban the online video service, YouTube. YouTube hostnames are currently redirected at the DNS level to a page that announces the court order."

What interesting about this? One offensive video has resulted in the Turkish government banning YouTube from the entire country.

March 05, 2007

YouNewsTV

From lostremote:

Stations owned by Fisher Communications, Journal Broadcast Group and Granite Broadcasting will soon launch a user video initiative powered by Broadcast Interactive Media. Called YouNewsTV, it will allow users to upload their own video, which will be vetted before it appears online. Users can share the video or embed it on their own blogs. As part of the revenue-sharing deal with Broadcast Interactive, the clips will have pre-roll ads, both on the TV sites and in the embedded experience. “If the video is not suitable to have advertising or is copyrighted material, it is not going up,” says Timur Yarnall, president/CEO of Broadcast Interactive. YouNewsTV is cleared to launch in more than 30 markets by midyear, with the first coming later this month.

March 01, 2007

Beyond Broadcast 2

I agree with Bryan's comments that this year's BB wasn't as good as last year. Why? Well I felt like I wasn't hearing anything new. Everything was a continuation of last year. Although the resounding message seemed to be 'we are still figuring it out' I guess in the last 8 months, we all didn't get very far. Where are all those ground breaking projects that are leveraging the promises of participatory media? Where is the cell phone in all of this? Its a huge player as an alternate medium. Beyond broadcast is by no means limited to the web. The only person who spoke about this was Tad Hirsch.

Obeying to the WITNESS policy of dividing and conquering (Bryan and I are not allowed to attend the same sessions/dinners) I chose to check out the Virtual Worlds working group. After sitting around and chatting for 20 minutes, the group was somewhat astounded when it was announced that the entire working session would take place in Second Life (and our group leader had already started the session with the SL-ers) A small mutiny occured when half of the 'first lifers' did not have a computer to access SL. And it was somewhat ridiculous when half of us did not have a computer (what? how can it be that not everyone has a laptop?) So us 'first lifers' had to hold our own session albeit without the ability to fly or don rainbow colored hair. I mentioned Habbo Hotel (which no-one seemed to recognize ) and very quickly realized that SL is Virtual Worlds. We didn't get a chance to compare and contrast MMORPG or any other types of virtual communites and worlds. I felt like I was sitting in a pitch room with many people offering to build WITNESS a space in SL.

My thoughts about SL? Is it a viable space? Yes, I think it is, depending on what you want to achieve. As John Lester from Linden Lab puts it. "Your SL space should be an extension of your org's mission, culture and message" He also warns against simply 'building' a building/space that links out to the web, comparing it to the early days of the web when a site was an online brouchure. I think ultimately SL provides a community space with more context than just a chat room or bbs. For better or worse, it does allow users to interact with each other and with the space/functionality you create. I am still struggling with why WITNESS would want to be in SL and if we do...what exactly would we 'build' One thing I have to say, SL-ers are very passionate!! If we can get them half as passionate about WITNESS issues as they are with SL,we might have someting there. Check out this story on an anti- war protest in SL as food for thought.

My BOF dinner included Raul Ramirez, Exec Director, News & Affairs, KQED San Francisco, Chad Lupkes, Campaigns.Wikia and Greg Gibson, social media technologist. We discussed the building of online communities. Each had our own angle. Chad has built numerous petition tools. His problem? No-one is using them. Greg is building a community annotation tool. His first project...will be the bible. (hmm, built in passionate community) We'll have to keep and eye on his project once it launches. Check out this SL anti-war protest as food for thought...

Other cool things of note:


  • 100$ laptop! Yes its green. Also there has been a call for game producers to develop educational games around the MDGs that can run on the laptop. Which is causing quite a stir in the serious games community. See Rik's blog
  • Drew Clark of the Centre for Public Integrity showed their site that enables you to map local media by ZIP (us postal code) and includes maps of broadband supply.


Unanswered questions still lingering in my mind:

  • Why was the guy from Four Eyed Monsters drinking out of a wineglass at what would be 10am his time?
  • Participatory democracy- is this just another one of those buzzwords? Yes we may have more online participation, discussions, etc...but aren't we leaving out a whole lot of people? No one really addressed or even acknowledged the digital divide. (well the audience tried to ask the question....)

What I did at Beyond Broadcast

I was thinking that rather than write up an internal report about Beyond Broadcast and a separate blog entry, I'd kill two birds with one stone and just post the whole thing here. So if my tone sounds a little more official, that's because it is.

Last weekend Tina and I drove up to MIT to attend the Beyond Broadcast conference. While I think it was a little less groundbreaking than last year's conference, it still was good and more importantly, still relevant. Although many of the same people were there talking about many of the same issues, it's still important that people continue to talk about and think about how media is changing, and what the implications are for both creators and consumers of media.

YouTube was one name that continually came up. Last year it was just one of many sites trying to compete in the user generated video space. This year it is the de-facto platform for online video. You could argue that the reason YouTube entered into the public conscious was the 1.6 billion that Google put into it, but I think YouTube's success is more like that of AOL in 90's, that is both provided a simple and easy-to-use interface allowing people to do what they wanted online.

YouTube makes it easy to upload and share video and more than a few people at Beyond Broadcast complained about YouTube morphing into essentially a broadcast platform, and abandoning it's user-created roots. I would take this one step further and argue that YouTube is the 1990's AOL of video and that as video-as-public-medium gains wider acceptance, people will migrate away from YouTube and other sites that limit what people either can do or are allowed to do.

The "Video on the Net: Beyond YouTube?" working group discussed these trends and conjectured about what video would look like in future. Shawn Van Every, who helped set up our Town Hall brainstorming meeting at ITP last year lead our breakout group and wrote up his thoughts on our discussion here. Also in the discussion was Audubon Dougherty who introduced herself after the discussion since she had worked with Sam on some Burma campaigns.

After the conference, I led a BOF (Birds of a Feather) dinner on "Change Oriented Media" - a term which I hopefully just coined, but I highly doubt. The idea was idea was to talk about what potentials exist for media creators to use the emerging collaborative and socially networked media platforms as a way to change and hopefully benefit society. The reality was there was a lot more discussion on environmentalism and architecture that on media - at least at my end of the table.

Still I did meet some interesting people. David Tamés from MIT and Kino-Eye.com, Perla Ni of ClickTV, Rob Berridge of WikiForGood, Nathalie Applewhite of Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting, Matthew Worsnick of the Columbia Graduate School of Architecture NetLab, Benjamin Roe of NPR, Paul Kamp of Backbone Networks, and Ethan Kiczek of CivicActions. Since my session was quite full, I didn't get a chance to talk to everyone, and there were a couple people who I'm not sure had signed up so I don't have their names.

In the end, it was a good conference and an opportunity to reconnect with people who've helped us in the past and whose advice will undoubtedly be useful in the future.