23 Jun Consent at the Centre: Meta’s Oversight Board Decision Reflects WITNESS’ Key Concerns on AI-generated Sexualized Impersonation
News and Events, Tech and Advocacy | WITNESSThe Meta Oversight Board, an independent body that reviews the company’s content moderation decisions, today overturned Meta’s decision to keep online an AI-generated sexualized video that had been reported by users, citing concerns about the enforcement of its policies on non-consensual intimate imagery (NCII). The ruling aligns with recommendations submitted by WITNESS in a public comment to the Board earlier this year. The case involved an Instagram video depicting a woman that was reported as pornographic but only age-restricted by Meta, which determined that it did not violate the platform’s “Adult Nudity and Sexual Activity” policy. In its decision, the Oversight Board reversed Meta’s determination and raised broader concerns about the company’s handling of non-consensual intimate imagery and its reliance on user reports to identify and remove harmful content, reflecting points raised by WITNESS in its submission. WITNESS Recommendations to the Board WITNESS’ submission argued that Meta’s current approach is structurally insufficient because it fails to recognize AI-generated NCII as a form of technology-facilitated gender-based violence (TFGBV), relies too heavily on automated systems that under-prioritize harm, and overlooks the central issue of consent. The submission also highlighted the need for the Oversight Board to reiterate its 2024 recommendations, many of